Best Part About “Anna Karenina”? The Costumes

“All, everything that I understand, I understand only because I love.” ~ Leo Tolstoy

Keira Knightly as Anna. Photo credit: Laurie Sparham.

This week, I went with my dear friend Diana to see “Anna Karenina.” It’s one of her favorite books by Leo Tolstoy. Admittedly, I’ve never read the book, though Tolstoy’s gift as a writer is something I should probably examine at some point. Nevertheless, I am a huge fan of films, particularly period pieces. I’m also a fan of Joe Wright, who directed the film, and had previously directed Matthew Macfadyen and Keira Knightly in the 2005 version of “Pride and Prejudice,” a particular favorite. In “Anna Karenina,” Macfadyen and Knightly play brother and sister, she with the starring role as Anna, he as Oblonsky. Dashing Jude Law plays Karenin, her husband. But ladies, don’t get too excited: Wright has played down Law’s good looks in this romantic tragedy.

Matthew Macfadyen
Matthew Macfadyen as Oblonsky.

Keira Knightly is always stunning, and I find her acting totally believable. Law is perfect as the husband, but it’s Macfadyen who steals the show as Oblonsky. Typically the somewhat stoic character, often straight-laced in such films as “Death at a Funeral,” “Pride and Prejudice,” and in the mini-series “Pillars of the Earth,” it was good to see Macfadyen let go a little and have some fun with his character.

Jude Law plays Anna's husband.
Jude Law plays Anna’s husband.

What distracts from the film, however, is the use of a “stage” to help tell the story, as if you are watching a play. In some parts, you’ll see the actor on the stage, and then the camera pans and you are with the characters in the scene. For someone who did not know the plot of the story, I found this very distracting. I appreciate Wright’s cinematic directing talent—and his guts to try something artsy (I found the cinematography in “Pride and Prejudice” to be stellar and lovely)—but in this film it fell a little flat. Seeing the actors on an old-fashioned stage, and then moving into scene, left me feeling disconnected from the story, and the characters.

This is not to say I am steering you from seeing it. By all means, get swept away into this period in time when women couldn’t divorce, and if they had an affair, they were ostracized from society. Plus, you may want to see it just for the beauty of what Wright puts on film. The scenery—and especially the costumes, designed by Jacqueline Durran—are gorgeous.

But this Hopeless Romantic likes a happy ending, and Tolstoy refused to let it be that way.

Gorgeous costumes by Jacqueline Durran.
Gorgeous costumes by Jacqueline Durran.

4 Comments Add yours

  1. Mom says:

    Tolstoy would never have endured on the Hallmark Channel, that’s for sure…the novel, however, is another story (no pun intended!).

    1. No, you’re right. But he may have made it on Lifetime, with all those tragedies!

  2. Seb says:

    Good as it is to see this made, I’m surprised there’s a big enough market to make films of this scope profitable these days.

    1. He’s made some good films that have made money…Atonement, Pride & Prejudice. I just think Anna Karenina is such a different plot…what was weird for me was I didn’t really care about the characters that much. (Remember—I didn’t read the book!) But, I just didn’t care. Whereas in Atonement and P&P, I care about all of the characters, even the ones I’m supposed to dislike. Thanks, as always, for the comment Seb and for following! 🙂

Thanks for the comment! Here's my reply...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s